The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Speedy Delete per G7. MrKIA11 (talk) 17:43, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 December 30#File:PavilionCollageJune2006.jpg. Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:33, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
On consideration, I think this image is a blatant copyright violation - have upped it to candidates for speedy deletion. Memphisto (talk) 10:39, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: delete. Photograph has no source information, authorship unknown. Although it is said that www.womensmemorial.org is federally funded, the site itself states that its photographs are "original images from the private collections of individual servicewomen, official military photographs, and photographs from other museum and archival sources" so that it cannot be assumed that photographs have a military source. The memorial or the Washington Post could presumably assist in sourcing. Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:59, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Kept - Peripitus (Talk) 09:41, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Materialscientist (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: keep
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:07, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: delete. Absent some supporting evidence there is no way we can be confident that this is a work of the US military. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:51, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: keep Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:03, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: delete. No good evidence that this is public domain and not obvious that a non-free content rationale can be constructed that will meet #3a. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:28, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn - The Puerto Rico Federal Affairs is reliable in establishing this as an valid image, and since all pictures of this guy are pre 1923...--Damiens.rf 23:03, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: keep - in this case I am satisfied that the link and note on the reputable linked site stating that the image is from the "National Archives" makes it almost certain that the free licence is correct - Peripitus (Talk) 01:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: delete: http://www.womensmemorial.org/Press/highres.html shows that not all images are in the public domain. Do I think this image is an official military one? It seems likely but that's not good enough. If it is military someone will be able to get a copy direct from the archives and make the matter certain. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:40, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: delete as previous nomination. The doubt which exists here can easily be removed by obtaining the image from the archives if it truly is a military work. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:45, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: delete as previous. In this case I'd add that it would be unusual for an image from a file held by NARA or the military to have been signed with a dedication starting "To my darling...". Surely there's some Wikipedia near Washington D.C. who could get copies of photographs from the archives so that we don't have to have these sorts of pointless discussions? Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Kept (yes I know I said delete below) - Peripitus (Talk) 11:09, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Kept - strong indication that the image is free—taken by another military person. I note that a more original image (here) shows here in what appears to be a military vehicle - Peripitus (Talk) 02:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: The result of the discussion was Keep. -FASTILY (TALK) 00:28, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Kept - It seems clear that this was created b a US soldier/employee - Peripitus (Talk) 21:24, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn - Source was fixed and image is really PD. --Damiens.rf 13:30, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:06, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: kept Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:07, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: keep. I've fiddled with the templates on the image page. Would be good if someone would sanity-check what I've done. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:00, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: keep. Source site is a respectable educational resource as Jmundo notes. It would be nice if someone could contact them and ask for more information on this picture but I don't see that as being essential. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:05, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]