I'm nominating Powderfinger discography for featured list status because I believe it meets all of the featured list criteria sufficiently. I discovered this article in a "not-so-good" shape, and decided to improve it, alongside Lincalinca and Dihydrogen Monoxide. Any suggestions for the article, criticism or errors that need fixing, feel free to point them out. ~ Sebi [talk] 02:29, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
# | Colour name/hex triplet | First usage | Second usage |
---|---|---|---|
1 | lightsteelblue | Studio albums, and the vertical bar along the side of Studio albums section. | 6 |
2 | #99CCFF | Video releases, and the vertical bar along the side of the video releases under "Other albums". | – |
3 | #BBEEFF | 3, not used again. | – |
4 | #F0F8FF | Alternating colour used throughout the article (note, doesn't look blue here) | |
Example: | |||
1 | #ABC123 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. | – |
1 | #ABC123 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. | – |
1 | #ABC123 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. | – |
1 | #ABC123 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. | – |
1 | #ABC123 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. | – |
1 | #ABC123 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. | – |
I count 4 uses of blue in this article. ~ Sebi [talk] 21:02, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That would be good—if you could get a hold of the DVD and list the rest of the directors. You really need to have both columns filled out if this is going to be featured. I was going to ask you to reformat the tables because they were inconsistent, but it looks like that's been done.
That's just about all I have left. Grim 22:48, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
<ref>
and </ref>
, and the formatting of the ((cite web)) template. I've fixed it now, though. ~ Sebi 04:47, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I couldn't find any directors specifically listed - it just said DVD tracks 1-10 == "Mushroom Music Ltd.", tracks 11, 12 == "BMG Group" (or something like that) - I doubt that's what we're looking for, although I haven't been fully following this discussion... Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 08:43, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Potential Closer's Question: A lot of this debate seems to be about potential improvements, rather than if it still meets the FL criteria. Does anyone still have active objections to this page becoming an FL? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scorpion0422 (talk • contribs) 18:52, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]