|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
This article was about the concept of bringing dead organisms back to life via technological means. It was deleted (and later redirected to undead) because it was "nothing unique" and "unencyclopedic" (see this AfD). A Google search for "corporeal reanimation" returns less than 500 results, most of which were copied from Wikipedia. I even personally cast a "weak delete" vote on the AfD since the article was poorly written. However, several other articles discuss the possibility of bringing the dead back to life. The concept of using technology to reverse death seems notable enough, but there are no centralized articles on this subject. I've changed my mind, and I don't think that we should delete articles just because they weren't well written. Also, the concept of "corporal reanimation" appears in many works of fiction, such as the Universal Soldier films. The article should be restored, but it should also be renamed and completely rewritten. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:43, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
how can mike mo capaldi be deleted? he's one of the best and most well-known ameteurs in the history of skateboarding. he deserves a wikipedia. canb't you let someone edit it better? wait i have an idea how about if he turns proffesional and becomes more noticable you allow someone to make him a page. i mean ryan sheckler has a wikipedia and he isn't even a good skater. mike mo is so please think about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skateskeet (talk • contribs)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |