February 5

Category:Louisville Athletic Club football seasons

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Defunct sports clubs and teams in Louisville, Kentucky. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 22:45, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only one page in category. Let'srun (talk) 22:44, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:King Tornado football

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 12#Category:King Tornado football

Category:Fictional nephilims

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 22:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Made by a blocked user. This is a NARROWCAT with few articles that would fit. I suggest a merge to half-demons, but not angels, as they are not 100% angel beings. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 21:42, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:British currency traders

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:07, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This category tree (Category:Currency traders (13)) is too small to need diffusion by nationality. Merge for now. Mason (talk) 21:30, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Distributaries of the Amazon River

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Amazon River and Category:Distributaries. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 01:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only one article –LaundryPizza03 (d) 19:31, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. It should also be merged to Amazon River. Mason (talk) 21:32, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional offspring of rape

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 20:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Similar in concept to Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_December_27#Category:Fictional_offspring_of_incestuous_relationships, which closed as delete. No real-world counterpart, which would violate WP:BLPCAT. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 19:15, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom Mason (talk) 21:32, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Fictional omnicide perpetrators

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 20:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Made by a blocked user. No article called omnicide exists, it only redirects to the broad concept of human extinction. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 16:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 19:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Actors from London by locality

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge as nominated with the exception of Category:Actresses from Islington (district). One of the targets is a ((category disambiguation)) (Category:People from Islington), so I am WP:IARing and declaring there is consensus to merge to Category:People from Islington (district). (This only affects the articles about Angel Coulby and Naomie Harris.) (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 22:16, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose merging
Actors by locality (for deletion merging)
Nominator's rationale: per WP:OCLOCATION; see nomination for "Sportspeople by locality" for further rationale. Omnis Scientia (talk) 14:13, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Updated target categories: I previous proposed deletion for the categories listed in the collapsed box. However, I have changed those to merge with their respective "Actors from *borough*" categories per discussion below. Omnis Scientia (talk) 15:42, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Marcocapelle, pinging so you're aware of the change; similar to how I did "Sportspeople" since that was the main concern. If needed, we can deal with "boroughs" categories later. But the first step should be to get rid of the locality tree, which is not very helpful, and simplify navigation. Omnis Scientia (talk) 15:45, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Fayenatic london, pinging for your opinion on this. Omnis Scientia (talk) 21:09, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 20:11, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 15:04, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Qwerfjkl, I believe the majority is in favoring of merging per nom. This intersection - like the one for sportspeople - is the definition of overcategorization. Omnis Scientia (talk) 20:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Assassinated politicians by political orientation

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete without prejudice against creating a separate tree for politicians assasinated specifically because of their political ideology. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:58, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Non defining intersection. Category description notes: "This category is for politicians who were assassinated and were conservatives", which doesn't not add any additional value. These people were not necessarily assassinated because of their political orientation. See Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_November_11#Category:Killings_of_politicians for similar arguments about non-defining intersections for deaths of politicians. Mason (talk) 18:27, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging folks from that previous discussion: @Marcocapelle, @Place Clichy, and @Thinker78. Mason (talk) 18:31, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:NONDEF,

a defining characteristic is one that reliable, secondary sources commonly and consistently define, in prose, the subject as having

Political parties, political orientation, beliefs is something that reliable sources commonly and consistently define for politicians.

if the characteristic would not be appropriate to mention in the lead section of an article (determined without regard to whether it is mentioned in the lead), it is probably not defining

As mentioned, politicians' articles regularly include the political orientation in the lead.
Sincerely, Thinker78 (talk) 18:41, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm saying that the intersection is not defining. Both elements by themselves are defining, but not the INTERSECTION. What is the added value of the intersection? If this category were for people who were assassinated because of their political values, that would be added value. Mason (talk) 19:00, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The assassination of politicians of certain political orientations is absolutely defining by itself. For example in Latin America, politicians were persecuted and assassinated because of their political orientation. In the United States likewise, specially after the Civil War. Same around the world, many instances of political persecution deriving in assassination of politicians because of their political orientation. Regards, Thinker78 (talk) 19:47, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Every time we seem to have the same conversation. What is the ADDED value beyond the politician being conservative and being assassinated? " You can't have it both ways, in your comment below you said that this category covers anyone who is "an assassinated conservative politician." The narrower category "Category:Politicians assassinated for being conservative" you say "gets to be more restrictive and subjective", but that's because there is added information that makes the category useful. At present, I see not added value to the category. Mason (talk) 00:00, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

  1. ^ Yes, I think "was" is better conjugation on singular they, avoiding unnecessary confussions that plural conjugation provides.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 14:14, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People of the Scientific Revolution

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Per WP:NONDEF, WP:SUBJECTIVECAT, WP:OCASSOC. This is not helpful for navigation. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Convert Category:People of the Scientific Revolution to article People of the Scientific Revolution
Nominator's rationale: Extremely subjective Mason (talk) 03:44, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 20:15, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 14:11, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sportspeople from London by locality

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge to boroughs (even for cricketers where the borough categories don't exist). * Pppery * it has begun... 21:33, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sportspeople by locality
Footballers by locality
Cricketers by locality
Nominator's rationale: per WP:OCLOCATION. The "Sportspeople from London" categories covered by the city; these have recently been divided further by borough and then by neighborhoods within the borough and THEN by sports. Makes navigation quite confusing and complicated. Omnis Scientia (talk) 11:25, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Updated target categories: I've changed target categories to their respective boroughs. There were a few for cricketers who didn't have borough targets so I suggest triple merge them to "Sportspeople from *borough*" and "Cricketers from Greater London" - @Marcocapelle, is this fine? Omnis Scientia (talk) 14:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Fayenatic london, for your opinion on this one. Omnis Scientia (talk) 21:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Rather than merging to "Cricketers from Greater London", I suggest renaming Cricketers from Carshalton to Category:Cricketers from the London Borough of Sutton etc. – Fayenatic London 22:03, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Fayenatic london, and the nomination itself? It is clearly a case of WP:OCLOCATION but I thought you may know better about categorization of British people. Omnis Scientia (talk) 22:07, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 20:16, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 14:11, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Qwerfjkl, I think majority is merge/rename as listed in the nomination. Only the creator of the categories is opposed while another oppose is against merging with a category that is not even the target category. Omnis Scientia (talk) 20:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Omnis Scientia, believe me, few things make closing more difficult than the nominator (or indeed anyone else involved) asking me to close a discussion in a certain way. Qwerfjkltalk 19:10, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Qwerfjkl, sorry... was a bit annoyed at the when I posted this reply. Its been relisted twice now when, IMO, it should have been straight forward. Omnis Scientia (talk) 20:12, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I understand where you're coming from, though. Sorry for trying to force it. Omnis Scientia (talk) 20:12, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sacred Heart High School (Ville Platte, Louisiana) alumni

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:09, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose Deleting Category:Sacred Heart High School (Ville Platte, Louisiana) alumni
Nominator's rationale: WP:NARROWCAT and WP:MFN
Sacred Heart High School (Ville Platte, Louisiana) is a small school in a small town and this category created in 2015 still only has 1 entry (Danny Ardoin). Those two articles are directly linked so the category does not aid reader navigation and Mr. Ardoin is already in Category:People from Ville Platte, Louisiana so there's no need for a merge. I tried and failed to populate the category, but no objection to recreating it later if a few relevant biography articles ever get published. - RevelationDirect (talk) 11:57, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Tulane Green Wave broadcasters

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 20:54, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose Deleting Category:Tulane Green Wave broadcasters
Nominator's rationale: WP:V and the spirit of WP:C1, an unpopulated category
There's not much here: two redirects which both point to List of New Orleans Pelicans broadcasters and that list article makes no mention of either Tulane University or their Green Wave team. Maybe the two announcers without articles also did work for a local college, but the current category doesn't aid reader navigation. - RevelationDirect (talk) 11:57, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:North America–Pakistan relations

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/delete as nominated. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 20:51, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: bilateral relations are... bilateral. These are basically containers of national bilateral categories. This structure was set up just for Pakistan and frankly I don't think it should be developed for other countries. The handful of articles about regional cooperation can be moved to Category:Foreign relations of Pakistan. Place Clichy (talk) 11:35, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge These relations are only with certain countries in the given regions, e.g. Category:Canada–Pakistan relations. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 19:17, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:South Korea–Oceanian relations

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/delete as nominated. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 20:51, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only one article: Korea–Pacific Islands Summit. It's a one-line article about a 2023 meeting, which can be categorized in the target category. Place Clichy (talk) 10:44, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge There should be categories only for specific countries or international organizations, such as Fiji–South Korea relations. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 19:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Overseas Turkish organizations

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 20:51, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Duplicate categories. Place Clichy (talk) 08:05, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:British scribes

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 01:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: These are medieval scribes; "British" is nonsensically anachronistic here. They are not referred to as "British" in academic literature (the equivalent word would be "Insular"). As an example, see this website. asilvering (talk) 07:46, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I notice after nominating that there are actually two modern scribes in here. These shouldn't share a category; they are fundamentally not the same thing. Patricia Lovett in particular is best described as a calligrapher. -- asilvering (talk) 07:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Alternative. I've created a child category which should solve the problem.Mason (talk) 14:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also I have restored the british writers parent category. Removing it is unhelpful as it isolates the category from the entire British people by occupation tree. Mason (talk) 14:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Smasongarrison These people aren't writers, as a category. If it isolates the category from the British people by occupation tree to remove that category, the sensible solution is to add "British scribes" to "British people by occupation", not to miscategorize it. -- asilvering (talk) 16:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And yet, you reverted my change [1] and did not add the "sensible solution". I have added it, but my advice to you is to make categories more helpful rather than less helpful. Mason (talk) 21:21, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Smasongarrison You can look at the time stamps on these and clearly see that the revert came before the comment here; I hadn't read your comment when I made the revert, and your edit summary did not make the reason for your objection clear. It would be very helpful if you would use pings when replying. -- asilvering (talk) 00:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Korean false documents

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Document forgeries. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 20:50, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose renaming Category:Korean false documents to Category:Korean-language documents considered to be forgeries
Nominator's rationale: Also see Category:Japanese false documents, both created by User:Invokingvajras. I'm not sure what name is appropriate for this cat, or if it should even exist. I don't know if claiming "false" is appropriate on Wikipedia, it implies we're passing judgement on what's true and isn't. Open to suggestions. We should also probably take the same action for this as we should the one for the Japanese document category. toobigtokale (talk) 06:03, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Victims in the United States

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. No prejudice against creating ((disambiguation category))s. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 20:50, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: There 's only one "Victims in Foo" category, and it's not helpful for navigation because it combines people who were murdered with people who died in aviation accidents. If kept it needs to be a contain category, as being a victim isn't defining by itself. Mason (talk) 05:36, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:African victims of crime

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 20:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge. There's no need to have a category with only one category in it. Upmerge for now Mason (talk) 05:34, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Breitbart London

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 20:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. This distinction isn't helpful for navigation. There are only two people in this category. Mason (talk) 05:27, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Frederick Lions football players

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 13#Category:Frederick Lions football players

Category:Alaska Nanooks football

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 20:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only one page in category. Let'srun (talk) 03:04, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Coroners of New York County, New York

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge * Pppery * it has begun... 03:02, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge this category. There's not need to diffuse by county yet. Mason (talk) 17:27, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:31, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Local elections in Tanzania

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 13#Category:Local elections in Tanzania

Category:Tile sets of gigapixel images from Google Arts & Culture

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Gigapixel images from Google Arts & Culture. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 20:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. This category only has one category in it, which isn't helpful for navigation. (Also the non-merge parent category Cateogry:Tile sets only has this category in it). Mason (talk) 01:11, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.