< December 8 December 10 >

December 9

Category:Wheelchair users

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 08:23, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Marcocapelle: I am not yet sure about this. First lets see what other people think about this. Now I see that this doesn't apply to every case. Davidgoodheart (talk) 08:19, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm changing my recommendation from comment to Oppose 22:30, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Global Alliance for Banking on Values

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: manual merge to Category:Community development financial institutions or appropriate subcats. (I also made a list in the main article.) – Fayenatic London 09:56, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Big corporations like banks are members of hundreds if not thousands of trade bodies. If the trade body is notable (which in this case I highly doubt—Wikipedia's page on it is a pseudoarticle sourced only to their own website), then it's reasonable to have a list page for people to see the members. Having a standalone category for something this tangential to the pages within it is nonsensical, though; if followed through, some articles would be in literally thousands of categories.  ‑ Iridescent 06:50, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 17:39, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 22:06, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
  • @Marcocapelle: then there should be a split. I'm a credit union member, my parents were credit union members, I liked the merge to credit unions. As to whether each member is "ethical" or "community development" should be deterimined on a case by case basis.
    William Allen Simpson (talk) 18:31, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • (as closer) By all means merge to better targets in the other parent hierarchy where appropriate. – Fayenatic London 19:35, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • @William Allen Simpson: if an individual article is about a credit union then of course it should be added to the credit union category too, but that can be done irrespective of this discussion. The discussion is about where the Global Alliance for Banking on Values as a whole belongs, and that is in ethical banking (if only, the word Values implies it is about ethics). Marcocapelle (talk) 20:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

American women activists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Containerise / Merge per nomination. – Fayenatic London 12:20, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge/containerize per WP:EGRS, activists in general need not be diffused by gender. Of course there are specific women's rights activists categories that should stay, but they are based on issue, not on gender per se. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:17, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 17:39, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 22:06, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Members of the Al-Mutairi tribe

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 December 17#Category:Members of the Al-Mutairi tribe

Category:Men by behavior

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 December 17#Category:Men by behavior

Category:Scholars under the Almoravid dynasty

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 December 17#Category:Scholars under the Almoravid dynasty

Male YouTubers

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 December 17#Male YouTubers

Category:WikiProject Rugby league (State of Origin) members

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 08:26, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: category for members of a project task force which doesn't exist. Nthep (talk) 12:42, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:WikiProject Rugby league (State of Origin)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 08:26, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: category for a project task force that doesn't exist. Nthep (talk) 12:41, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Video games about X

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:26, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose deleting
Nominator's rationale: Not WP:CATDEF; as a followup to Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 November 5#Category:Video games about child abduction. Qwerfjkltalk 11:38, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Qwerfjkl:, we've had contact before about some categories and while I absolutely believe several of these can go (Video games about curses, Video games about birthdays) and some other just too similar (Video games about influenza outbreaks, Video games about diseases) I think this is an overzealous nomination. Like Phediuk pointed out, several of these categories do make sense. I have to oppose as well. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 13:18, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
More