< July 28 July 30 >

July 29

Category:Subreddits

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:26, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Undo category split. The parent category is not big enough to bother splitting, and I would argue that the Controversial Reddit communities article, moreover, is largely treated by sources as reflecting on Reddit as a whole, such that it would belong in the parent category anyway. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 15:38, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People associated with Arthritis Research UK

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete both. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:33, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose Deleting Category:Arthritis Research UK
    • Propose Deleting Category:People associated with Arthritis Research UK
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:OCASSOC, WP:NONDEFINING and WP:SMALLCAT
These two categories contain only two articles combined: the Arthritis Research UK article I just added and a single person with only a passing reference to being a member. The only growth potential I see here is adding other, loosely associated people. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:04, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I notified Stumbling stone as the category creator and I added this discussion to WikiProject Medicine. – RevelationDirect (talk) 00:04, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not opposed to such a category if there are 4 or so more articles in addition to the 1 here. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:30, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Grand Masters of the Order of Saint Charles (Mexico)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete both. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:36, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose Deleting Category:Grand Masters of the Order of Saint Charles (Mexico)
  • Propose Deleting Category:Grand Masters of the Order of Guadalupe
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT and WP:OCAWARD (WP:NONDEFINING)
Both of these awards were only given to Emperor of the Second Mexican Empire. There was only ever 1 emperor of the 2ME (Maximilian I). So it's not defining and will never grow beyond one article. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:02, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The notified Asalrifai as the category creator and I added this discussion to WikiProject Mexico. – RevelationDirect (talk) 00:02, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Order of Elizabeth

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:41, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose Deleting Category:Order of Elizabeth
Nominator's rationale: WP:OCAWARD (WP:NONDEFINING)
The Order of Elizabeth was an Austrian award for women created by Franz Joseph I of Austria. During it's 20 years of existence, an average of more than 100 women per year received the award so it doesn't seem defining. Strangely, the current category only contains 1 biography article: Franz Joseph's male son who never received the award and whose article makes no mention of it. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:01, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The notified Mimich as the category creator and I added this discussion to WikiProject Austria. – RevelationDirect (talk) 00:01, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Franz Joseph did give this award to 2 of his daughters but they certainly didn't win this on individual merit, although that's the stated purpose of the award, and the article makes no claim to being similar to the OBE. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:30, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The award was intended for ladies, regardless of social status or religion, for merits in religious and charitable work". Sounds very similar to the OBE to me! -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:14, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
More