The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The "keep" !votes are not very persuasive. In addition, this AfD suffered from a lack of participation, so no prejudice to nominating this again in a few months, if improvement is not forthcoming. Randykitty (talk) 11:50, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yoco Technologies[edit]

Yoco (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. The sources are a mix of affiliated, routine coverage, and rehash of press releases. A WP:BEFORE search threw the same coverage Dom from Paris (talk) 13:48, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 13:50, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 13:50, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 13:50, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, i am the author of the article, there is a significant coverage and independent sources in Google News, when we look with the keyword "Yoco" Yoco in Google News Regards, MathieuPaul1977 — Preceding unsigned comment added by MathieuPaul1977 (talkcontribs) 14:07, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, i will move the article from "Yoco Technologies" to "Yoco" since it the more used name in internet. Regards, MathieuPaul1977 (talk) 13:00, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I added more references (ie Forbes), they are many other independent sources talking about Yoco in News. MathieuPaul1977 (talk) 12:30, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 15:09, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please state what sources "seem" to be good coverage and how they meet notability guidelines. I would suggest doing a bit more editing to try and understand policy and guidelines better before discussing deletion. Dom from Paris (talk) 00:37, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:21, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all, i improved the article by adding more information and more reliable sources, like a new one from "Jeune Afrique" and another from IOL. i will change the search bar to put the right name of the subject "Yoco" instead of "Yoco Technologies" like i did before. Regards, MathieuPaul1977 (talk) 08:41, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.