The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, as rewritten. Shimeru 06:56, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yahweh (disambiguation)[edit]

Yahweh_(disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)

This disambiguation pages only has two links and is unnecessary. A link to Yahweh (song) is present in the article Yahweh in the form of a ((for)) template, therefore, the disambiguation page serves no purpose and is orphaned. –Crashintome4196 15:33, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 15:00, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete there is a redirect to the U2 song on the Yaweh page. More or less serves the function fo this page. --Tainter 15:39, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Be bold and blank the disambig page, then list it as speedy G6. I'll hold back on that, but it's allowed. YechielMan 17:25, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. CSD.G6 allows for "removing a disambiguation page that only points to a single article", so I'm not sure if this technically qualifies. This is the only time I've done this as far as I can remember: delete per WP:SNOW. -- Black Falcon 18:06, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, speedily if possible; unnecessary disambiguation page – Qxz 19:10, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: I found in Yahweh three entries that do not really belong there, so I put them here into a See also section. Tikiwont 19:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep revised version--Tikiwont 20:23, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as revised (w/see also) section. SkierRMH 20:53, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as revised. --UsaSatsui 21:07, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as revised now it has WP:SNOW for keeping. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dacium (talk • contribs) 22:18, 15 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]
  • See, this is the danger of WP:SNOW. We've now invoked it both ways on this one article. That should speak volumes. --UsaSatsui 22:28, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I'm coming to the party late but the current version looks fine to me. Dugwiki 23:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, and I agree with UsaSatsui regarding my skepticism with invoking WP:SNOW in these discussions. It's not a guideline or policy, and it looks to me to be too subjective and open ended. (I do like the funny picture, though.) Dugwiki 23:08, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep hate to say it - links to songs on the top of real articles is bandspam. The proper way to deal with it - and Ive been over it with the good folks on wikien-l (you can bring it up there) is to simply make a disambiguation page. That way theres no misuse of hatnotes as wiki-linkspam and there is still a reference. -Ste|vertigo 00:56, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• keep as revised please this is the best way to do it yuckfoo 02:02, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.