The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 13:17, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

YUCC[edit]

Non-notable club. Speedy declined by anonymous IP. PROD removed by article's author. So here we are at AfD. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:38, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As posted on Talk:YUCC - "Speedy declined by anonymous IP. PROD removed by article's author. ". What exactly are you talking about? What is Speedy? and PROD? Just because the club isn't notable to you, doesn't mean it isn't notable at all. It's well known in certain circles (the UK university kayaking circle), so I really don't see how your argument stands. Mankeyrabbit (talk) 14:44, 12 February 2009 (UTC)— Mankeyrabbit (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Delete, No assertion of notability. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 14:46, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete 3 hits on Google for the club itself. - Ddawkins73 (talk) 15:01, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable. Also, the IP edits and removal of the speedy template are suspicious. -- smurdah^{[citation needed]} 15:58, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Also, the IP edits and removal of the speedy template are suspicious" What on earth? "Suspicious"? suspicious of what? I talked to the author and he informed me that the "wiki police" had been very abrupt and rude, and as an amateur not really knowing what he was doing followed their advice. The page has been edited by another member of the club - representative for press&publicity actually, who doesn't have a wikipedia account. I don't understand what's "suspicious" about it... Mankeyrabbit (talk) 23:51, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

-- Clarified that the suspiciousness relates to the removal of the "speedy" template - that was not done by a member of the club. Mankeyrabbit (talk) 23:53, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There is nothing at all suspicious about IP edits (i.e. edits made by non-logged-on users). Much of our best content has been written by IP editors. And removal of a speedy deletion template is simply indicative of an editor who is unfamiliar with our procedures, and has no bearing on this debate. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:21, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It is a small college sports club with approximately 15 members. No notability is asserted. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 00:00, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.