The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 17:38, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wintertree[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. No independent WP:RS and I could not find any additional. Tagged for notability for years. shoy (reactions) 15:04, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh for goodness sake, can someone delete the article already without going through a week-long AfD. No-one is disputing the PROD rationale (fails WP:NPRODUCT). The only reason the article is still here is because it was dePRODed to appear in a Signpost column (a userspace copy has been created to substitute), then an admin decided this meant the PROD could not be reinstated despite the exceptional circumstances. – Teratix ₵ 15:22, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:NPRODUCT — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheSLEEVEmonkey (talk • contribs) 15:34, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:35, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (and I'd be fine with a speedy) for being unambiguous advertising of a non-wiki-notable product. XOR'easter (talk) 17:40, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete in mainspace but keep a copy in userspace for the Signpost link/historical reference. b uidhe 18:42, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Fails G11 as there is salvageable content there but this is irrelevant as the subject is non-notable. I know I’m only the 5th !voter but I feel the temperature of this page dropping already.... —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 22:11, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails basic notability test. Glendoremus (talk) 03:53, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, Willbb234^Talk (please ((ping)) me in replies) 07:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. TROUT at Miraclepine for deprodding an article with no good faith belief that it should be kept. I endorse instant closure by anyone with page delete userright per approximately a half dozen [[WP:random capital letters]] rationales. Alsee (talk) 02:20, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.