The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Daniel.Bryant 06:36, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't meet WP:ORG criteria Samw 01:03, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indication of notability, and the fact that it was created in September 2006 doesn't exactly lead one to believe that any will surface. -Elmer Clark 01:18, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above; fails the WP:ORG and WP:ADS criterias.--TBCΦtalk? 01:18, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Tornado DDeleTe Non-notable wrestling federation, fails WP:V. Caknuck 01:30, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Entirely non-notable / made-up "group". (Although we should be honoured to have an article written by the Heavyweight/Intercontinental Champion himself...) Bencherlite 01:51, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a hoax. A Google search only brings up 3 Google hits (the articles page, this AFD page, and a WP mirror). The fact that the logo looks like it was made by a 3 year old with crayons doesn't help it. Lrrr IV 11:06, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I would also recommend deleting the picture. Lrrr IV 11:06, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unverifiable. -- The Anome 12:00, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable wrestling league, possible WP:OR, certainly fails WP:ORG and that logo doesn't help.--John Lake 22:57, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to lack notability Warfieldian 22:20, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.