The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Disney's Saratoga Springs Resort & Spa. No consensus to keep as a separate article, and merge is supported as an option by most participants. RL0919 (talk) 22:59, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Walt Disney World Conference Center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced for over a decade according to the tag and fails WP:GNG/WP:NBUILD. I've done an extensive before search through a number of articles which all advertise conventions at the center, but I surprisingly can't find any articles which discusses the actual convention center in my before search. SportingFlyer T·C 05:14, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 05:14, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 05:14, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:19, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • 1&2 are clearly not significant (unless there's more on 1 past the page cutoff, but it seems to switch topics, and 2 may not be a RS?), 3 is clearly primary, 4 is also primary (within an advertisement), 5 is the type of coverage I sifted through in my BEFORE search - lots of X conference is happening at the conference center without discussing the conference center, and 6 is actually the best of the lot but almost certainly isn't enough to show notability. As I've said, I'm surprised I didn't find all that much, and I hope someone else comes in and demonstrates coverage, but this is the level of coverage I've been finding. SportingFlyer T·C 12:17, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:54, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:23, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.