The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Varanapally[edit]

Varanapally (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally PROD'd due to lack of references or Google hits, and therefore the article could not be verified. I can only quote the de-PRODing editor: "This article is in terrible shape. I de-WP:prodded it in the hope that it will be improved. If it's not improved in the coming weeks please put it out of its mercy at WP:AFD. As the person who de-prodded it, I wish I could've de-prodded it without prejudice to re-prodding. Unfortunately, Wikipedia doesn't work that way." Well, a few weeks have gone by, and the article has not changed. Singularity42 (talk) 18:46, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete without prejudice to re-creation if the location is notable enough for inclusion and a suitable article can be created, or send to the WP:Incubator for improvement if the topic meets inclusion guidelines. See also: Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics/Archive 43#Varanapally. I am the de-prodder. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 18:54, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff 00:35, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Non-notable ancestral home. Salih (talk)

• Strong Delete (if possible, speedy): No proof of notability, nor even any claim of notability. I think it qualifies for speedy. --Ragib (talk) 21:09, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Under what category? A7 does not cover geographic locations (for good reason...) Singularity42 (talk) 15:36, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.