The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result wasSpeedy keep I'm withdrawing the nomination per WP:SNOW. Pascal.Tesson 04:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ultimate Disney[edit]

Contested prod. Not a notable website. Does not meet WP:WEB as far as I can see and I find little in the way of third-party coverage, despite the high Google count. Pascal.Tesson 01:34, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep supported by a notable film critic, and claims it was mentioned in an official release from disney ("Disney Dossiers: Files of Characters From the Walt Disney Studios"), I believe that make it notable. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 01:41, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There is indeed third-party coverage, as well-known DVD news/reviews sites like TheDigitalBits.com, TVShowsonDVD.com, and HomeTheaterForum.com have cited UltimateDisney.com many times for specific Disney-related news stories and release dates. Two of those sites have their own Wikipedia pages as well, and those articles are shorter than that of UltimateDisney.com's — Preceding unsigned comment added by Escapay (talk • contribs) 22:31, 14 February 2007
Keep Agree with Malevious --Bdrischbdemented 03:42, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Agree with Malevious and Escapay. JackSparrow Ninja 04:00, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well I guess that idea just got snowed out. I'll just withdraw the nomination and close as keep... Pascal.Tesson 04:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.