The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ugur Group Companies. MBisanz ^talk 01:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ugur Cooling[edit]

Ugur Cooling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Little to no significant coverage from reliable sources. Existing sources aren't significant coverage and (or) not reliable. I see a lot of mentions here, but they aren't enough to make this company notable, fails WP:GNG. Also, seems to fail WP:NCOMP. —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:39, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:41, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:41, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as certainly questionable from the current article. SwisterTwister talk 23:46, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • @SwisterTwister: That's not really a legitimate argument. Read WP:ARTN. That an existing article does not, in and of itself, show the subject is notable does not meant that the subject is not... the article might just suck. Not claiming this is notable, but you really should check first. Revent^talk 00:08, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Still delete likely as my searches actually found nothing better, only a few links at News and Highbeam and nothing noticeably convincing. SwisterTwister talk 00:23, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - NeemNarduni2, any Turkish coverage for this company? Thanks and regards—UY Scuti ^Talk 10:48, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Ugur Group Companies, the latter of which incidentally should be renamed to Ugur Group if it passes AFD. This company's name in Turkish is "Uğur Soğutma", and there are sufficient WP:RS online in Turkish, including national dailies like Hürriyet [1], [2] and several short mentions in the finance news of Milliyet to improve that merged article. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 11:03, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• I've added some more sources and the official web sites under the group companies today. Please tell me any other thing you need i am a Turkish user. Badursun (talk) 11:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC)badursun[reply]

• @NeemNarduni2: you might want to reconsider your !vote here too, I guess —UY Scuti ^Talk 15:14, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Duly reconsidered, thanks, per rationale at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ugur Group Companies. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 15:28, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am the author of the article and the digital representative of the company. Can you tell me how else I can improve the article then I get rid of the "deletion" sign. It is effecting the company image. Regards. 85.103.146.22 (talk) 12:57, 29 January 2016 (UTC)badursun[reply]

• Comment - I shouldn't have relisted this, apologies! —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Ugur Group Companies, which already contains quite a bit of information about the Cooling subsidiary. --MelanieN (talk) 01:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.