The result was delete. Arguments to keep (outside of North8000) amount to: (1) it's no worse than other articles in the same category, (2) we can't get good sources for something this obscure, and (3) keep it but rewrite it. These aren't rationales grounded in policy and there's no case being made for why precedent shouldn't apply here, so delete. causa sui (talk) 20:46, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No indications of notability. Was REFUNDed from a previous PROD but article unchanged since. HighKing (talk) 13:38, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]