The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:53, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to be a non-notable protologism. Chris Griswold (☎☓) 09:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because I'm just a typical deltionist. NeoFreak 13:32, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Couldn't this article just be "Typical (insert race, national origin, religion, or anything else) man (or woman)"? --UsaSatsui 21:00, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.