The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Turtle (syntax), which was the best I could come up with out of this. - Daniel.Bryant 09:26, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Turtle RDF[edit]

This article appears to be an instruction manual that has a non-encyclopedic tone. It also is an orphaned article with not many links.

If it is decided for keep, then I would recommend a complete rewrite

Guroadrunner 12:08, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 15:00, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Either delete as unencylcopedic how-to information, or cut out all that information and reduce to a stub – Qxz 19:09, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
delete as unencyclopedic. Wikipedia is not a how-to book. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 21:59, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - This article topic is a duplicate of Turtle (syntax). -- Whpq 22:22, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I forgot to add that I do not support a merge as this article is a how-to so there is no content worth merging. -- Whpq 22:23, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Turtle (syntax) per Whpq. Pomte 12:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki either to Wikiversity or Wikibooks (I'm not sure which is appropriate, but it seems to me it fits in one of those) Noroton 16:44, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.