The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 22:21, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tuff Truck Bag[edit]

Tuff Truck Bag (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have speedied a previous article on this title as G11 in the past, and it has come back in a new form. It still absolutely lacks notability, but I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt by not speedying it again. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:59, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Nothing in the article, or on the web, suggests this product is remotely notable. --Mkativerata (talk) 07:08, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 07:36, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Devils advocate, but tf this is deleted then then why keep the entry for Chia Pet. --Dozi0509 (talk) 14:43, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Are you serious? There's any of coverage for Chia Pet. Joe Chill (talk) 16:06, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.