The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 13:15, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trashball[edit]

OK, this game is re-invented every day worldwide. But what of this article? Re-write in a sensible tone? Or delete because there is no professional trashball circuit? — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 12:53, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not really a notable 'sport', but rather a backyard variation of basketball. Alpha 4615 (talk) 20:54, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whether a game/sport is professional doesn't really matter unless we're discussing the notability of the players. We should focus on whether we can write an article about it using reliable sources without turning it into a game guide. At the moment I think it has one suitable reference which might make it a good candidate for transwikification to a wikibook of games (or Scout games) - Mgm|^(talk) 22:31, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails notability. Adds no value. --Orrelly Man (talk) 19:53, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete trash. JuJube (talk) 09:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.