The result was Keep. Editors should continue the discussions to improve and/ or merge the article on the article talkpage and/or be WP:BOLD. JERRY talk contribs 03:00, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm proposing this article's deletion because a similar article, landphoon, was deleted in August despite having seven unique sources, while this term has exactly one. In short, it's not encyclopedaic since one person appears to have made up the term in 1999, it does not exist in the glossary of meteorology, and (unlike landphoon) no one else I know has ever used the term (I'm a meteorologist). Thegreatdr (talk) 16:37, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]