The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Non-Admin Closure. Tiddly-Tom 07:16, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Reiss[edit]

Tom Reiss (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

No sourcing; not totally convinced on his notability. Nominating for AFD review. Lawrence § t/e 03:38, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Writer for the New Yorker, publisher of multiple books, at least one of which sold well...I think he passes WP:NOT. Perhaps the cause would be better served by adding cite tags to the article. Vrac (talk) 06:52, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - agree with rationale of Vrac. SidP (talk) 22:37, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of academics & educators deletions.--Lquilter (talk) 01:51, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. His book, 'The Orientalist', received a fair amount of coverage from reliable sources, and he seems fairly notable himself. The article could use better sourcing, though. Terraxos (talk) 02:35, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.