The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus to delete. W.marsh 15:23, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Mall (Edgware)[edit]

non-notable mall ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 21:29, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I've been there. Shopping centres like these are thirteen in a dozen. No specific notability, no connections to historical events. Delete. JFW | T@lk 22:08, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Joe 22:44, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Malls and shops are generally not notable. See Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Precedents#Cities_and_villages. --Metropolitan90 01:13, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep Anti-mall bias. More notable than many museums noted on wikipedia. I don't really like malls that much myself, but they are notable institutions. Bobby P. Smith Sr. Jr. 01:20, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep We have many articles on minor topics. This is worthier than the ads for minor porn stars that don't get deleted. Osomec 03:02, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Just because other non notable things are on wikipedia doesn't mean this shouldn't be deleted ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 03:55, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I feel that this is a notable institution of commerce. Bobby P. Smith Sr. Jr. 04:05, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per policy. feydey 19:45, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Nothing in the article makes it appear encylopedic. Vegaswikian 01:44, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep. Encyclopedias are reference books that deal with all fields of knowledge (the word comes from the Greek words enkyklios paideia, meaning general or well-rounded education). Since Wikipedia doesn't have very many size constraints, we can include a lot of stuff. Also, I'm not sure it's worth destroying someone else's work and alienating that person--who could be a contributor to other articles as well--over an issue as uncertain as notability. Something increadibly notable to a physicist may be non-notable to a chemist, for example.--Primetime 21:10, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.