The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deletion by admin Mailer diablo as the article falls under the criteria of CSD G12. Non-admin closing of orphaned AFD per WP:DPR.--TBCΦtalk? 20:24, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Telepresence-enabled cognitive apprenticeship model of teacher professional development[edit]

Non-notable and not content suitable for Wikipedia (Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not). --24fan24 (talk) 03:01, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as admitted original research. Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. No evidence that this ...theory?... has any reliable sources from verifiable indpependent, non trivial publications. Resolute 03:31, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
delete as highly unencyclopedic. Of very dubious notability. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 03:33, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as copyvio of [1]. So tagged. eaolson 03:47, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The creator of this article is apparently the author of that site, as asserted on its talk page. A speedy delete tag was already removed for this reason. Resolute 04:00, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Original research. Maxamegalon2000 06:24, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - OR, OR synthesis, and complete bollocks. Moreschi ^{Request a recording?} 11:20, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As I have stated, I, the author of the article, am the copyright holder for all of the text and information in the article. The article is a presentation of the state of the science in cognitive psychology as it applies to teacher professional development and telepresence in education. The research was peer-reviwed and published in a doctoral dissertation.rsedmo

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.