The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article's subject is found to not be notable. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:31, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet Pool

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Restored contested prod of non notable book, articles consist mostly of a plot summary and character list - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 13:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 13:17, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 13:17, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 13:19, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 13:24, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No third-party sources or in-depth coverage to demonstrate notability, and the editor that requested restoration after it was previously PRODed has shown no interest in working on the article to establish notability. --DAJF (talk) 15:46, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Publisher and retailer web sites do not demonstrate notability.SephyTheThird (talk) 18:53, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.