The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.--Húsönd 04:37, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Squaremouth[edit]

Squaremouth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

The first edit of this page contained a link to squaremouth.com after its entry—a quite obscure site (see infra). I prodded as advertizing disguised as an article/disambiguation page. Prod was removed by creator who stated as his basis that he had removed the external link, thus apparently removing the advert. I still think this is disguised advertising and remains so with the text still listing the site. Since we do not have articles for either of the other two squaremouth definitions (which I think are pretextual), I do not think we need a disambiguation page for this at all. In any event, even if kept, the website should not be listed as it fails to meet WP:WEB. The website returns 4 hits for a Google link search [1], and has an Alexa rank of 501,921 [2].--Fuhghettaboutit 00:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a disambig that doesn't actually disambig to any articles. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:03, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Gzkn 01:43, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Crum375 03:20, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Staxringold _talk^contribs 03:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete as either ((db-spam)) (it's still unsalvageable advertising) or ((db-web)) for obvious reasons. -- IslaySolomon | talk 03:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete' per WP:SPAM. Sharkface217 04:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. This is most likely spam. MER-C 06:49, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per spam.--Meno25 06:53, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, WP:SPAM, fails WP:WEB. Terence Ong 10:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Sneaky. Grouse 14:23, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete per IslaySolomon. Danny Lilithborne 23:26, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.