The result was keep. Primary concern seems to have been addressed by editors. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 22:49, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is as yet unpublished research. ((prod)) removed by anon IP editor with no other edits to their credit. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:28, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Reasons for deletion, not a single one of which is the article contains original research. If the article IS OR in its entirety, then go ahead, but this article is NOT, and you continue to support its deletion with all OR removed. Therefore, you're either accusing me of OR or playing a game with the time of wikipedia editors. Your choice, and it's not ad hominem if it's true.
For some reason, you've nominated a legitimate topic for deletion, and you're forcing the AfD to its end, in spite of the fact that your reason for deletion no longer exists and was a criterion for fixing that part of the artice rather than deletion in the first place.
So, forget wikipedia and editing articles, when editors' time is wasted by game players who are only interested in using other editors' and the community's time rather than creating a decent encyclopedia. And stay off my user page, I'm done with you and wikipedia. That's enough bs.
--IP69.226.103.13 (talk) 20:25, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]