The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 14:32, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

South Loughton Cricket Club[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Falls under WP:NORG and the available sourcing does not come close to meeting the standard of having multiple reliable independent secondary sources discussing the organization in significant detail. Additionally the advertising/SPAM is borderline for G11 and could be an additional reason, beyond lack of notability, to delete under policy. Barkeep49 (talk) 16:42, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Barkeep49 (talk) 16:42, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Barkeep49 (talk) 16:42, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Barkeep49 (talk) 16:42, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.