The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was delete. Sango123 17:21, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sotones Records[edit]

Independent record label that, based on Google search, doesn't seem to exist beyond a few myspace pages. Listed web page for the company is nothing but a banner and a poster for a concert last February. There is no other website content, and no links from that page. Fan-1967 02:59, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete there's no suggestion anywhere that they've been involved in promoting any significant artists or made any money. In fact their myspace profile even describes them as a "company" (their quotation marks). --IslaySolomon 03:19, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Which raises some questions about the band article for Leisure (band). - Fan-1967 04:48, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, fails WP:CORP and WP:MUSIC. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 03:50, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above reasons. If only Myspace and Wikipedia could exist in seperate universes....HumbleGod 08:07, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• We were just trying to write about a label locally important to us (fans here in southampton) - I guess there's a difference between our local area and the wider world. New to wikis, so won't complain if a delete does go ahead.--Comrade jo 11:36, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per nom. --Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 17:22, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. --Domthedude001 18:49, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.