The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. W.marsh 18:37, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nom - speedied (at least) once already. Fails WP:N. It is primarily self-sourced. It lacks any reliable sources. Rklawton 22:25, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - non-notable. RJASE1Talk 00:09, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.