The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:11, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sins of a Rhetorical Nature[edit]

Sins of a Rhetorical Nature (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Prod contested without improvements. Subject has only one google hit outside Wikipedia and the homepage[1], and that one hit describes it as "Still in its infancy as of Nov '06." Article makes no claims to notability either. Fram 19:29, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless evidence of notability is added. JulesH 09:53, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Appears entirely unnoticed by multiple reliable, non-trivial sources (or anyone else?), therefore no WP:N nor WP:V. MURGH ^disc. 12:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.