The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 11:33, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ryze[edit]

I am relisting this for AfD under the procedures of WP:DRV when a deleted article is overturned. I undeleted the article following the discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Ryze, but see The article's original AfD vote. Personally, I prefer keep, so don't count this nomination as a deletion preference. User:Zoe|^(talk) 17:20, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Although I have ((prod))ed this article in the past, it now has significantly more content. Crucially, it's notability has now been established through mentions in several press sources (linked from the article). I therefore consider it to meet the guidelines at WP:WEB. _└ ^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 18:51, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, per UKPaolo. Kukini 05:16, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I am the author of this version of the article. I have no relationship to the previous versions or previous authors, but I do believe this web site meets WP:WEB standards. I would also note it has a very high Alexa ranking. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dlazzaro (talk • contribs)

• exactly, this is essentially a different article about the same subject, and one which unlike the previous version, establishes notability. Nice work, Dlazzaro. _└ ^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 07:33, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I think this is a Speedy Keep. Thanks for persevering, people! - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 15:23, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, although reluctantly, because it's still very stubby and I wonder if it'll improve -- but those aren't grounds for deletion. --BrownHairedGirl (talk • contribs) 16:41, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: It now passes WP:WEB, but it's a dagnabbed stub. Grr. How can I vote to keep when it established notability but doesn't say anything? Geogre 12:42, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: If possible, I will expand the article when I have some time. I will admit I am not an expert on the inner workings of the service. Dlazzaro 22:15, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep without any kind of reluctance whatsoever. Silensor 22:39, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.