The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure), sources have been added to article, even cursory search for subject indicates notability, consensus= keep. Nom's reasons problematic as article does assert WP:NN regardless of if article meets it or not Fr33kman^{talk APW} 19:37, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Rocco[edit]

Ron Rocco (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Notability issues Avi (talk) 20:34, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:54, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I've had a look for some sources and added a couple to the article. Nothing as yet meeting WP:CREATIVE but I think the artist is worth a closer look, given that he has been active since the late 1970s.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 22:51, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.