The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per the uncontested sources. But this will need some cleaning for promotionalism, so tagging Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:22, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rightware[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Typical corporate spam. sources like tech crunch, unreliable source for media as per standards. Light2021 (talk) 21:36, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:28, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:28, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:45, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:09, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as corporate spam. WIkipedia is not a hosting service for this company's office locator and product brochure. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:37, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per previous editors' points.--SamHolt6 (talk) 15:08, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I find two sources that meet the criteria for establishing notability - this review of the software and this article from ubergizmo. Any issues with the article can be fixed by removing overly-promotional text. The article therefore meets WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 15:47, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To discuss whether the sources establish notability and whether (per editing/deletion policy) removal of the promotional parts is possible instead of deletion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 18:23, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The articles from TechCrunch, AnandTech, and Ubergizmo are usable as third-party reliable sources for this topic, and I found additional sources that support this subject passing GNG:

Dreamyshade (talk) 21:11, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.