The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keepRaichu 16:27, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Undeleted after a DRV discussion, but many called for relisting this. Unsure about notability here so no vote. Sjakkalle(Check!) 06:43, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Easily passes WP:MUSIC by virtue of their current national tour dates supporting the UK arm of the Arctic Monkeys' tour, after which they perform more dates in their own right. --Tony Sidaway 06:50, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It all comes down to whether touring as support band is enough to satisfy WP:MUSIC. I'm not sure what the precedent is so no vote at the moment, but my personal feeling is that as this band are unsigned (or were when I last checked), they weren't the headliners on the tour, they are not yet sufficiently notable. --kingboyk 10:58, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Tony Sidaway and Thivierr. DarthVader 12:56, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Though I'm not sure that touring as a support act satisfies WP:MUSIC, since it's a fairly notable tour with a large audience, I'd say it does push them over the bar. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:55, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as they have another tour soon and the love will spread further. I know ive searched on here for them before only to be disappointed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.68.66.122 (talk • contribs) .
Keep per above. Support bands surely meet the touring requirement of WP:MUSIC. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEMES?) 23:04, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep not only have they played support on a very notable and high profile UK tour, but have braced the pages of magazines such as NME and Sandman, recieve airplay on major slots on Radio 1 and judging by their rate of success so far, will bring many more reasons to keep this page in coming months. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.107.163.124 (talk • contribs) .
Keep My argument is well documented on the Deletion Appeal log page. :) Definately meets WP:MUSIC. Captmonkey 14:58, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in agreement with reasons cited on the deletion appeal, esp. tour support, mentions in NME and airplay on Radio 1 craigand
Keep -- whoever deleted the page should have checked for evidence of notability themselves; the band have sufficient media profile in the UK for notability to have been assumed. 212.56.68.42 15:28, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Actually whoever wrote the article should have *cited* evidence of notability, in the beginning. I disagreed with the deleting admin, but really the fault here lies primarily with the creation of an (originally) unsourced article. --Rob 18:55, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.