The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. King of♥♦♣ ♠ 06:30, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to be a non-notable philosopher. Was debating deleting via A7 but decided to get more input. Kwsn (talk) 15:47, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I beg to disagree. Renaud Barbaras is getting more and more influential in phenomenology circles, creating a very personal philosophy. His researches are included as part of the revival of phenomenology in France in PROF. DR. LASZLO TENGELYI's NEUE PHÄNOMENOLOGIE IN FRANKREICH, along with Marc Richir's and Jean-Luc Marion's. --Malone25 (talk) 17:07, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of♥♦♣ ♠ 00:26, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
keep—not only meets wp:prof as noted by Xxanthippe, but almost certainly satisfies WP:GNG as well. here are three rs which discuss barbaras's work: one, and two, and three. also, although he doesn't seem to occupy a named chair, he is a full professor at the sorbonne, which is probably a more prestigious post than most named chairs not at the sorbonne. that's not important, though, due to his being discussed in reliable sources.— alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 23:04, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.