The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-22 10:41Z

Rdmart[edit]

Rdmart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

desctibes an organization without explaining it's importance and has no references. Prod removed without explanation. i kan reed 17:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete no claim or evidence of notability, no sources. Nuttah68 17:25, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Don't be too quick with the speedy the claim is marginally there, it just isn't supported by any sources, or clear enough(as in the importance of the subject has been marignally clarified in the article since the removal of the prod and moving to AfD. I'll still endorse deletion if I can't work with the author to track down sources. i kan reed 18:05, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete (but not speedily) - Collection of links, Doesn't explain itself. JameiLei 18:13, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.