This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 22:30, May 12, 2005 (UTC)

Rahul Easwar

[edit]

Self-promotion. Amazon hasn't heard of the person, and Google barely has. See Lifology, above. CDC (talk) 21:52, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

OCLC WorldCat - a very big union library catalog - hasn't heard of him either. CDC (talk) 22:01, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 05:05, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Vanity. Quale 02:27, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.