- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Withdrawn by nom. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:55, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Protofuse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It seems it is a microagency. No significant coverage. MarioGom (talk) 17:42, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 17:42, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 17:42, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 17:42, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The article was hijacked in 2019 diff; it used to cover a musician (of dubious notability), until an SPA replaced this content with an article for the advertising agency. Cheers, gnu57 18:09, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Genericusername57: I'm not sure what should I do now... maybe request technical close of this AfD and revert the hijacking? --MarioGom (talk) 18:29, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Sure, that sounds sensible. Cheers, gnu57 15:03, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdraw: Given the previous hijack of the article (see above), I withdraw this AfD. --MarioGom (talk) 15:19, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.