The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 16:32, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Privatelektro[edit]

Privatelektro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Unknown group of artists with no reputation or noticeable success. Basically an advertisment, written by some member itself. Also nominated for deletion in Wikipedia DE. --Niabot (talk) 18:40, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: self-publishing artists on their own online digital label. Insufficient independent 3rd party sources WP:CORP. JamesBurns (talk) 05:38, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete One would think a notable rock label would recieve significant coverage in the news, but this label only has 6 references in google news. And they appear to be trivial mentions. Themfromspace (talk) 22:31, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• NON Delete This is no rock label and not only a digital netlabel. please read before writing. this article already stayed here for more than 2 years, only a german contributor says this is nominated for deletation in germany. he maybe not like to expand this kind of music in wikipedia. please read reviews on the pe site and on english ambient review sites (http://disquiet.com/?s=privatelektro) and http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&domains=neural.it&sitesearch=neural.it&q=privatelektro&btnG=Find. Sinuswelle (talk) 02:49, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.