The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 09:44, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pornopedia[edit]

Pornopedia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable website; fails WP:WEB. I'm unable to find any coverage of this website in reliable sources; all the sources provided so far are either trivial or non-independent of the subject. Robofish (talk) 16:05, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I vote delete, almost everything in the article is either useless, or advertising a website with very little notability. Kevinmon (talk) 01:39, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:10, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.