The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete as a non-notable organiation, WP:ORG refers. (aeropagitica) 17:15, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pink Therapy[edit]

Pink Therapy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

notability not asserted; reads like promotional material. Along with Dominic Davies article forms a small walled garden created by a single-purpose account. For GHits I have only been able to find amazon, wikipedia, own website, and publisher; nothing to satisfy WP:NOTABILITY.

Accordingly I add Dominic Davies to this nomination. Akihabara 12:39, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Pink Therapy as not asserting notability. Not so sure about Davies himself, he seems to have at least some minimal notability as a published author (by a real publisher, not vanity press), he's given a seminar at the British Association for Counselling AGM and I found a magazine article quoting him. Weak delete because although the sources suggest the possibility of notability, they do not prove it, and because of the suspicions of WP:COI. Demiurge 12:55, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Coredesat 23:08, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete book, keep and wikify Dominic Davies and merge relevent book content to the article. (Whew!) -Toptomcat 12:53, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 22:09, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Pink Therapy. Appears to cover three distinct meanings of the term, none of which assert WP:NOTABILITY. A list or association of notable people is just that, not automatically a notable list or association itself. DMacks 08:51, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete Dominic Davies. Asserts some WP:BIO notability ("first"/"pioneered"/"earliest example") even if in a relatively narrow category, but does not provide citations to these assertions. Citing the points of notability would convert me to weak keep (weak due to narrow-sounding realm of notability). DMacks 08:51, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.