The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:15, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pictual (website)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The link is dead, the project is not active. The notability template (2010 year) supports my proposal to delete this article. -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 09:44, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:15, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 06:47, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete short-lived online dictionary project, of no significance. GoldenRing (talk) 09:10, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I couldn't find any sources, and nor did I expect to. Non-notable website. Moswento ^talky 09:31, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NWEB. Harsh (talk) 07:40, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.