The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Daniel.Bryant 08:04, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peter arbor[edit]

Does not seem to meet WP:BIO notability criteria. Also suspect WP:COI issues. Failed prod. RJASE1 ^Talk 02:32, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As the person who prodded this, it looks like a vanity bio to me. The fellow seems to be quoted in a couple of news articles, but is not the primary subject of any that I could find, making almost all of the contents unverifiable. The only thing that struck me as maybe possibly notable is the claimed listing in Forbes, but I think that's too weak on its own and couldn't verify it on the Forbes site anyhow. William Pietri 02:56, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Please note the username of the original author. RJASE1 ^Talk 02:57, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Veesicle (Talk) (Contribs) 03:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unsourced, most likely made-up. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. non notable. But I cannot understand why people cannot write surnames uppercase. Cate |_Talk 10:41, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no sources, no references = not notable Alf photoman 13:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.