The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, closing slightly early per WP:SNOW. No arguments for keeping. --Coredesat 07:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OMG!Con[edit]

OMG!Con (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)

Tagged as having notability problems and unreferenced since December 30, 2006. Google search does not turn up any reliable sources that would allow this article to pass WP:CORP notability criteria. --Farix (Talk) 00:48, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions. -- Farix (Talk) 00:50, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Most of the google hits aren't even about the convention, they're just places where someone said "OMG! conwhatever". --tjstrf talk 00:57, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete does not cite any valid source to indicate its notability (besides the link to the OMG!con website) and I doubt that this is truly as notable as the other Anime conventions.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 01:07, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for reasons above.--PatrickD 02:48, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, non-notable anime convention, only started last year. JIP | Talk 07:50, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. -- 9muses 12:19, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above comments. JCO312 14:31, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. TheRealFennShysa 16:05, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: does not seem to meet WP:CORP. -- The Anome 16:39, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom.--Rudjek 20:52, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Possibly not notable. Bigtop 23:20, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, not notable enough. Insanephantom (my Editor Review) 05:23, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 06:37, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete If it fails the Google test... S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 01:25, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.