The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy delete as repost —Quarl(talk) 2006-07-05 08:10Z
No name blog. Fails WP:WEB -- Samir धर्म 07:14, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, I could swear I tagged it a little bit earlier and it got deleted, at any rate an nn blog. I tagged it a speedy again if I did wrong please remove or tell me too.--John Lake 07:19, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I looked in the deletion log and saw that I was right, it is a 3 times repost [1]--John Lake 07:25, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
the blog has a wide readership if you'd bother to go to the site and look. It is an up an coming satirical site comparable to Maddox. I have no idea why the fact that only one contributor to thecockcockcockarticle is somethign that makes it unworthy of existence, unless you are attempting to imply that I'm plugging my own blog, which is ludicrous. Show some decency and respect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarc1pedia (talk • contribs)
The main objection to this article is not that it has only one contributor; it's mainly that this is not yet notable. Ghits yields very few unique results. Please check WP's policy on web site notability. HumbleGod 07:36, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, nn blog, fails WP:WEB, and is a repeat offender. No reason for us to have to keep doing this. HumbleGod 07:32, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: In retrospect, I should have forwarded the author to WP:DRV as opposed to listing it here, after I had speedied it and he recreated it -- Samir धर्म 07:35, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.