The result was Keep. Cbrown1023 talk 01:09, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nominating every page below for deletion.
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a music almanac, and we shouldn't be in the business of keeping track of every top-n-songs list ever published. All the articles I've nominated are nothing but the list, no commentary, no explanation of the importance of the particular list, and as far as I can tell, none of these lists are linked from anywhere else. There's a copyvio issue here too: although the articles may not be cut & paste from the published list, the assembly of the list constitutes a creative act, and republishing the list in full is violating the copyright of the lists themselves. With no commentary or other use of the lists at all, there is no reason to think it's fair to use those lists in this way. Also, there is a direct precedent: see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Zealand Top Fifty Singles of 2003. (Also, many many lists like these have been deleted before.) Some are contested WP:PRODs. Delete all. Mangojuicetalk 21:58, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Your signature with timestamp_talk:Veinor|(talk to me)]] 00:01, 21 February 2007 (UTC)