![]() | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2008 July 1. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. Also please see WP:Coatrack. Gwen Gale (talk) 15:49, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article has political purpose. and This word has been expired in Korea. In ko.wikipedia, Its Deletion discussion is being continuous, and ja.wikipedia, It was deleted.--Kwj2772 (talk) 14:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Just because this word was made up recently does not qualify it for deletion. It still happened in history, and even if it is not so well known, it is still notable. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a lineReview Me! 11:44, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Actually that does qualify it for deletion. The inclusion criteria for nelogisms is pretty clear, with the reliable source criteria for neologisms telling us that
Article also fails inclusion criteria for structures. The word might merit a mention in an article about the protests but as for a redirect, this seems like a highly unlikely search term in the English language Wikipedia; the Korean Wiki is a better place for this (anyone know the status of that article). I would also disagree that the protests are in any way notable as well. People on the peninsula have been regularly and frequently petitioning their government for redress of grievances in a most enthusiastic manner since the armistice. P.J. O'Rourke has written about the ubiquity of protests in the ROK and Larry Bond has even used them as a plot device. Cheers. L0b0t (talk) 15:27, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
p.s Who are Larry Bond and P.J. O'Rourke? They might be notable in one country, but not in the world, so if you want to take examples, well search and show some good ones. --Caspian blue (talk) 16:07, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]