The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 18:35, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Kosh-Kaya[edit]

Mount Kosh-Kaya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability isn’t established because topic has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject WP:GNG JaneciaTaylor (talk) 17:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 December 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:42, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:56, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep "Named natural features are often notable". There seems to be enough about this mountain that a short, verified encyclopedic article can be written. The peak is also known as Mount Koshka, if that aids in research. Hog Farm (talk) 18:01, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. There are many sources in Ukrainian and Russian Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. --Yakudza (talk) 02:31, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What are the sources so I can add them? JaneciaTaylor (talk) 21:33, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• "Кішка, гора Кішка | Енциклопедія Сучасної України". esu.com.ua. Retrieved 2019-12-03.
• "КІШКА". leksika.com.ua. Retrieved 2019-12-03.
• "ГОРА КІШКА". leksika.com.ua. Retrieved 2019-12-03.--Yakudza (talk) 01:56, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep for above reason, i.e., there are plenty of sources in the relevant languages. @Nom: it's down to you to look for them before making a nomination.Ingratis (talk) 12:06, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

although recommended, see WP:BEFORE (and editors who hang around afd wish that more/all nominators did so):), it is not compulsory for them to do so. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:21, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment, before other editors pile on the "plenty of sources, why didnt the nom look for them" route just noting that although their 1st edits were in July 2019, the nominator hasnt done many until October so are quite new ie. dont bite new editors. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:39, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  It doesn't take much effort to check the interwiki links, which even if you can't read the language show that sources exist.Ingratis (talk) 11:04, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:29, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep needs to be improved, but passes WP:GEOFEAT easily. SportingFlyer T·C 07:35, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, meets WP:NGEO, a number of sources are available online showing its importance in the field of astronomy ie. "Some characteristics of astronomical climate on Mount Koshka, Simeiz" (sub needed) (assuming koshka is the same mountain?). Coolabahapple (talk) 07:58, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment, Ukrainian WP has more info on this mountain - see here, although sources are needed. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:01, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Ukrainian article does give two sources, although both are in print and in Ukrainian. Ingratis (talk) 21:37, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for clarification. Coolabahapple (talk) 21:48, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep clear pass of WP:GEOLAND and WP:SNOW Lightburst (talk) 17:57, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Seems clear now. --Doncram (talk) 23:17, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment, just to note that nominator has continue to improve the article, thanks:)) Coolabahapple (talk) 13:36, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Clearly passes WP:GEOLAND. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 14:23, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.