The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as per unanimous positive consensus and no calls for deletion outside of the nominator. A non-admin closure. And Adoil Descended (talk) 01:34, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mosmetrostroy[edit]

Mosmetrostroy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally tagged this for speedy, which was declined. The article is advertising-ish and unreferenced, and may not meet the WP:GNG. Specs112 t c 12:30, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 18:48, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 18:48, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: G=23k, GN=50, meets WP:N.-- Dewritech (talk) 15:30, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • WP:GHITS. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:54, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Has refs and looks to be notable. INeverCry 16:57, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Refs =/= WP:GNG passage. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:54, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep I've added sources. Take a look at the article now. It's a very big company and its activities have been well covered by the media. --Moscowconnection (talk) 10:51, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.